FEC Complaint Alleges Democratic National Committee and Hillary for America Continue to Lie About Trump Russia Dossier | News Direct

FEC Complaint Alleges Democratic National Committee and Hillary for America Continue to Lie About Trump Russia Dossier Coolidge Reagan Foundation Complaint Illustrates Violations of FEC Settlement Agreement

News release by Coolidge Reagan Foundation

facebook icon linkedin icon twitter icon pinterest icon email icon Washington, DC | June 22, 2022 12:01 PM Eastern Daylight Time

The Coolidge Reagan Foundation, an organization dedicated to defending, protecting, and advancing liberty, particularly the principles of free speech enshrined in the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, announced a new complaint it filed with the Federal Election Commission (FEC). The Complaint follows a recent Coolidge Reagan victory from a 2018 Complaint resulting in the FEC issuing a $113,000 fine against Hillary for America and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) for lying about their funding of the Russia Hoax dossier.

As part of that settlement with the FEC, Hillary for America and the DNC owned up to their falsely filing opposition research – which is not entitled to attorney-client privilege - as “legal services.”

The new Coolidge Reagan complaint alleges that Hillary for America and the DNC violated their settlement agreement with the FEC when they turned around and claimed attorney-client privilege to that work in Special Counsel John Durham’s prosecution of Michael Sussman.

The Complaint states, in part:

“…The FEC found probable cause to believe HFA and the DNC violated federal campaign finance law by falsely reporting the purpose of their payments through Perkins Coie to Fusion GPS. Caught in their lie, HFA and the DNC scurried to contain the crisis by entering into Conciliation Agreements with the FEC. Each agreement states, ‘Solely for the purpose of settling this matter expeditiously and to avoid further legal costs, Respondent does not concede, but will not further contest the Commission’s finding of probable cause to believe…’

“…HFA’s and the DNC’s intervention, arguments, and supporting declarations in United States v. Sussmann violate their agreement to ‘not further contest the commission’s finding of probable cause to believe’ Fusion GPS’s opposition research into Trump and preparation of the Steele Dossier did not constitute legal services…”

The full Complaint is available at on the Coolidge Reagan Foundation website and by clicking here.

Dan Backer, Counsel to Coolidge Reagan Foundation, who brought the Complaint, stated, “Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee promised they would not contest the Commission’s findings – but just days later, they already violated the pledge.”

“Political elites like Hillary Clinton and the radical left will never learn their lesson. The Clinton machine continues to lie about funding the Russia Hoax dossier even after being caught, fessing up, and paying a fine,” Backer continued. “They don’t care about the truth, but we do. Our determination is unwavering, and we expect the FEC will agree with us again as it calls out this violation of its settlement agreement.”

###

Please visit: https://www.coolidgereagan.org/.

For more information or to schedule an interview with a CFR spokesperson, contact Dan Rene at 202-329-8357 or danrenejr@gmail.com.

 

Contact Details

 

Coolidge Reagan Foundation

 

Dan Rene

 

+1 202-329-8357

 

danrenejr@gmail.com

 

Company Website

 

https://www.coolidgereagan.org/

project media

Tags

Coolidge Reagan FoundationDemocratic National CommitteeHillary for AmericaTrump Russia DossierJohn DurhamMichael SussmanFederal Election CommissionFusion GPSPerkins CoieDan Backer